Last updated: February 16. 2013 5:58PM - 125 Views

FILE - This is a Monday, Jan. 23, 2012, file photo of the founder of the collapsed Polly Peck business empire Asil Nadir as he arrives at The Old Bailey court in London. Former fugitive tycoon Asil Nadir was found guilty at the Old Bailey Monday Aug. 20, 2012 of  three counts of theft. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth.File)
FILE - This is a Monday, Jan. 23, 2012, file photo of the founder of the collapsed Polly Peck business empire Asil Nadir as he arrives at The Old Bailey court in London. Former fugitive tycoon Asil Nadir was found guilty at the Old Bailey Monday Aug. 20, 2012 of three counts of theft. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth.File)
Story Tools:

Font Size:

Social Media:

(AP) Turkish Cypriot tycoon Asil Nadir was found guilty of theft Monday in relation to the collapse of his Polly Peck business empire, one of a series of debacles that focused public attention on the corporate greed of 1980s Britain.


Polly Peck was an obscure British company until Nadir took over in 1980, turning the modest textile firm into a vehicle for a wave of acquisitions, including Del Monte's fresh fruit operations and Japan's Sansui Electric Co. The stock went through the roof and Nadir became one of Britain's richest men.


But the story fell apart after investigators began probing irregularities in Nadir family trusts. The tycoon denied charges he had stolen from Polly Peck to line his pockets, but the company's share price collapsed and the company itself went under in 1990.


The saga was deeply embarrassing for the then-ruling Conservative Party, to which Nadir was a major donor, and it made a fugitive of the tycoon, who fled the country for his native north Cyprus only months before he was due to stand trial.


Nadir spent nearly two decades as a fugitive from British justice, but he made the dramatic decision to return to London in 2010, saying he wanted to clear his reputation. Legal analysts speculated that Nadir was gambling that so much time had elapsed that a prosecution would be too complex to pull off successfully.


The gambit seems to have backfired. A jury at London's Central Criminal Court found him guilty of three counts of theft and not guilty of a fourth count of theft.


Jurors are still deliberating a further nine counts of theft.


Associated Press
Comments
comments powered by Disqus


Featured Businesses


Poll



Mortgage Minute