BELLEFONTE — Jerry Sandusky's lawyers argued Thursday that he deserves a new trial because his defense lacked sufficient time to prepare for the first one, but the judge did not immediately rule after an hour-and-a-half hearing.
Attorneys for the former Penn State assistant football coach cited other alleged flaws in the trial, including that they were swamped by about 12,000 pages of documents and other materials, that Judge John Cleland should have instructed jurors about the years it took for victims to report he had abused them and that hearsay evidence was improperly allowed.
But prosecutors countered by showing most of the documents and records were not relevant to trial and got defense attorney Joe Amendola to admit that even after reviewing them after trial he did not find any that he would have used at trial.
Prosecutor Frank Fina told Cleland that the issue of failure to report by the victims was a major theme during the trial and was brought up during both parties' opening statements and closing arguments, and during cross-examination of the eight victims who testified against Sandusky.
He said Amendola's performance at trial, and his questioning of witnesses, are evidence that a fair trial took place even though the case moved from arrest to verdict in about eight months.
He used everything he had to cross-examine these young men, Fina said.
Sandusky, 68, attended the hearing but played no active role in the proceedings. He briefly greeted his wife and supporters beforehand.
The former assistant football coach was convicted in June of 45 counts of child sexual abuse.