Tired of ads? Subscribers enjoy a distraction-free reading experience.
Click here to subscribe today or Login.

The first step to repeal a management residency requirement is on Tuesday’s Luzerne County Council agenda.

Implemented a year ago, the ordinance requires the top manager, eight division heads, prison deputy warden, sheriff and heads of emergency management and 911 to establish residency in the county within six months of their hiring.

Council is set to vote Tuesday on introducing an ordinance repealing the requirement, which is necessary to advance the matter to a final passage decision at a future meeting. At least four of 11 council votes are needed to introduce ordinances. The meeting starts at 6 p.m. at the county courthouse in Wilkes-Barre.

County Councilman Rick Williams, who spearheaded the push to repeal the rule, said during a recent work session that top-ranked applicants who live across the county border should not be automatically disqualified due to residency.

“Clearly, we need to balance the need to provide opportunities for Luzerne County residents and at the same time provide the best personnel to staff our county government,” Williams said.

Linda McClosky Houck, council chairwoman, said the main reason she’s heard for keeping a residency requirement is to favor qualified county residents. But she believes the policy says something else as well.

“If you say that we will only then hire people who already live in Luzerne County, what you’re doing is saying that you don’t think that Luzerne County people are competitive with people from outside the area,” McClosky Houck said. “So you’re actually saying two things.”

County Manager C. David Pedri has supported eliminating the requirement, arguing the pool of prospective applicants should not be limited in “any way, shape or form.” He stressed all positions impacted by the requirement are filled by qualified county residents, adding the county is “lucky to have them.”

Suit settlement

In other business, council is scheduled to discuss a proposed confidential settlement of litigation filed against the county and its Children and Youth agency. The lawsuit was filed by Nichole Puscavage and Anthony Cook over the January 2015 death of their 21-month-old son, Anthony Puscavage.

The suit alleged Children and Youth failed to properly screen the toddler’s maternal grandmother and her husband before the toddler was placed in their home. The county has argued the agency dealt with the boy’s parents for years, stemming from complaints that ranged from neglect to overcrowding and excess partying at their home.

The council agenda said the settlement will be covered by county insurance, but the dollar amount is confidential due to a court order.

Williams
https://www.timesleader.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/web1_Williams-Rick.jpg.optimal.jpgWilliams

By Jennifer Learn-Andes

[email protected]

For other local news stories, click here.

Reach Jennifer Learn-Andes at 570-991-6388 or on Twitter @TLJenLearnAndes.